Skip to Content

Opinion: Have sporting events become too dangerous for fans?

Fans should be able to fill up a stadium like Lincoln Financial Field without having to worry about their well-being.
Fans should be able to fill up a stadium like Lincoln Financial Field without having to worry about their well-being.
Ian Rausch

For decades, sports have served as a unifying force, bringing together fans of all backgrounds to celebrate their teams in packed stadiums and arenas. From the ruckus of a college football rivalry to the chanting echoing throughout an NBA arena, shared passion for the game has created a sense of community and tradition. However, troubling incidents over the past few years have raised the question: Are these events still safe for fans? With high-profile acts of violence, unruly fan behavior, and security concerns on the rise, major sporting eventsespecially marquee events like the upcoming Super Bowl—will find increasing pressure placed upon them to ensure that safety is considered without taking away from the excitement that makes these events so unique. 

 

The violent incidents in sports continue to mount, and one cannot look the other way. The Chiefs’ parade celebrating their second consecutive Super Bowl in 2024 was tainted by a shooting that left one dead and multiple injured. During an August 2023 Chicago White Sox game, two fans were struck by gunfire inside Guaranteed Rate Field; the fact that such a weapon was able to make its way past stadium security should elicit concern about stadium security protocols, in and around the building. Fans shouldn’t have to worry about whether or not they’ll be shot when they come out and support their favorite teams.

 

Fan violence has also occurred with smaller-scale attacks, such as fights at NFL and college football games, a common occurrence of late. Social media is filled with videos of fans in the stands attacking other fans, sometimes fueled by alcohol, sometimes by heated rivalries, and other times just by general rowdiness. Not all these cases may have been isolated incidents of misbehaviour, but the frequency with which these incidents happen does suggest that something has gone wrong somewhere with fan conduct and security enforcement.

 

The thought that is at the forefront of everybody’s mind recently is what the Super Bowl is going to be like in two weeks, especially considering the recent Bourbon Street terror attack in host city New Orleans that killed 15 people and injured at least 57 others. With the “big game” fast approaching, security will be under an intense spotlight as 83,000 fans pack the Caesar’s Superdome to watch the Chiefs take on the Eagles.

 

The NFL and law enforcement officials have assured the public that security measures for the Super Bowl will be extensive. Security screenings in the past years have included metal detectors, bag searches, undercover officers, and high-tech surveillance.

 

But as incidents like the White Sox shooting show, even the most seemingly secure environments can have gaps. Beyond direct security threats, the mayhem surrounding such a huge event presents dangers of its own. Stampedes and overcrowding have led to injuries at major sporting events in the past, and with the Super Bowl taking place in a city known for its party atmosphere, there is always a risk of large-scale altercations breaking out in and around the stadium.

 

So what needs to happen to keep supporters safe? The responsibility for fan safety falls on multiple parties—stadium security teams, law enforcement, league officials, and even the fans themselves. Security staff at venues should implement more thorough searches to prevent weapons from entering games. While metal detectors are already in place, they may need to be upgraded with technology that better detects concealed weapons. An overall increase in the number of police officers both uniformed and undercover, especially at high profile games like the Super Bowl, could also help deter violence and ensure quicker responses to incidents. Vendors at many stadiums have experimented with cutting off the sale of alcohol earlier in games, because even though nothing screams football like downing 6 ice-cold Miller Lites, intoxication only fans the flames of altercations in the stands. And if fans can’t keep their acts together at the stadium, teams need to take a firmer stance against unruly behavior, banning repeat offenders from stadiums and promoting initiatives that encourage respectful fan engagement.

 

Despite everything that’s happened, for many fans, the joy of attending live sports far outweighs the risks. But for others, the growing number of violent incidents has made them think twice about spending money on tickets, especially when watching from the safety of home is a viable alternative. The reality is that no public event—whether it’s a sporting event, concert, or festival—can be 100% secure. However, that doesn’t mean leagues and security officials shouldn’t be doing everything possible to minimize the risks. If incidents continue to rise, sports teams may face not just the financial hit of declining attendance but also the loss of the very thing that makes live sports so special: the shared experience of being part of a crowd, united in passion rather than divided by fear.

 

As the Super Bowl nears, all eyes will be on the security efforts in New Orleans. Will it serve as a model for how to ensure fan safety in the future? Or will another preventable tragedy force the sports world to confront an issue that has been ignored for too long?

More to Discover
About the Contributor
Ian Rausch
Ian Rausch, Staff Writer